linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E4E677D.5000102@tudelft.nl>
Date:	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:39:09 +0200
From:	Éric Piel <E.A.B.Piel@...elft.nl>
To:	JJ Ding <jj_ding@....com.tw>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Aaron Huang <aaron_huang@....com.tw>,
	Tom Lin <tom_lin@....com.tw>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...l.unipv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech - add v3 hardware support

Op 19-08-11 14:50, Seth Forshee schreef:
>>
>> Yes, in other words, in the case of v1 or v2, the switch(fingers)
>> does nothing if fingers == 0.
>>
>> Maybe you could do put these 3 lines inside a "if (fingers != 0)":
>> +	input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X, x1);
>> +	input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y, y1);
>> +	elantech_report_semi_mt_data(dev, fingers, x1, y1, x2, y2);
>
> I don't think elantech_report_semi_mt_data() should be moved inside the
> condition. It's doing the right thing when fingers is 0.
Oh, right, it already tests for this case :-) My mistake.

Éric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/