[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKnu2Mpu2H18=xF4OwmqSgML_dDa6SE7ZqHFjLb2GL_-Wabqsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:19:44 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>, sundaram@...com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DMAEngine: Define generic transfer request api
2011/8/19 Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@...el.com>:
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
>> I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on
>> using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is better
>> suited than anyone else of us to select what scheme to use,
>> in the end he's going to write the first code using the API.
> And Unfortunately TI folks don't seem to care about this discussion :(
> Haven't seen anything on this from them, or on previous RFC by Jassi
Well if there is no code usig the API then there is no rush
in merging it either I guess. Whenever someone (TI or
Samsung) cook some driver patches they can choose their
approach.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists