[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1313772419-21951-15-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:46:30 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/43] microblaze: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call
it. This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler
(which is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the
code was to modify sighand->action[] directly.
As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on
signal delivery.
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
index 5996711..90de06d 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
@@ -270,9 +270,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
return;
give_sigsegv:
- if (sig == SIGSEGV)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
}
/* Handle restarting system calls */
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists