[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110819181713.GC2270@zod.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:17:13 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/minix: Verify bitmap block counts before mounting
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:10:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > -unsigned long minix_count_free_blocks(struct minix_sb_info *sbi)
> > +unsigned long minix_count_free_blocks(struct super_block *sb)
> > {
> > - return (count_free(sbi->s_zmap, sbi->s_zmap_blocks,
> > - sbi->s_nzones - sbi->s_firstdatazone + 1)
> > + struct minix_sb_info *sbi = minix_sb(sb);
> > + u32 bits = sbi->s_nzones - (sbi->s_firstdatazone + 1);
> > + unsigned blocks = minix_blocks_needed(bits, sb->s_blocksize);
> > +
> > + return (count_free(sbi->s_zmap, blocks, bits)
> > << sbi->s_log_zone_size);
> > }
>
> > + unsigned blocks = minix_blocks_needed(bits, sb->s_blocksize);
> > +
> > + return count_free(sbi->s_imap, blocks, bits);
>
> I'd pass sb->s_blocksize to that sucker instead of blocks; less redundancy
> and we have good uses for it there anyway.
OK. So just move the blocks calculating into count_free itself. I'll
rework.
> > +static inline unsigned minix_blocks_needed(unsigned bits, unsigned blocksize)
> > +{
> > + unsigned blocks = bits / (blocksize * 8);
> > +
> > + if (bits % (blocksize * 8))
> > + blocks++;
> > + return blocks;
> > +}
>
> Yecchh... The usual idiom for that is DIV_ROUND_UP(bits, blocksize * 8)
> (see linux/kernel.h for details).
Will fix.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists