linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: jump_label: arch_jump_label_text_poke_early: add missing _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1313788396.15704.117.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:13:16 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>
Cc:	jbaron@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: jump_label: arch_jump_label_text_poke_early: add
 missing __init

On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 17:51 -0300, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 15:20, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 21:04 -0300, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> >> arch_jump_label_text_poke_early calls text_poke_early, which is
> >> an __init function.  Thus arch_jump_label_text_poke_early should
> >> be the same.
> >
> > but text_poke_early is not __init but instead __init_or_module. Your
> > patch just caused this bug:
> >
> 
> Sorry about that.  I have:
> 
> # CONFIG_MODULES is not set
> 
> which makes __init_or_module equivalent to __init for me.  Thus the
> patch was fine for my case, but I expect your modification is the
> right thing to do overall.

Um yeah.

I guess you're another one just like Peter Zijlstra ...

"Modules? Modules? We don't need no stinking modules!"

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/