[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110820012943.GD2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:29:43 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
Cc: Sylvain Rochet <gradator@...dator.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.35.7 to 3.0 Inotify events missing
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:37:56AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Possible solution:
> Then this can be solved, in principle (if there's no better way), by
> watching a "virtual directory" that gets all events for when the
> access doesn't have a parent directory. There needs to be some way to
> watch it, and some way to get the appropriate file from the event (as
> there is no real directory. Or maybe there could be a virtual
> filesystem (like /proc, /sys etc.) containing a magic directory that
> receives these inode-only events, such that lookups in that directory
> yield the affected file. Exactly as if the directory contains a hard
> link to every file, perhaps a text encoding of the handles passed
> through sys_open_by_handle_at.
There is a better way - stop using idiotify... It has always been a
mistake, driven down our throats by filemangler and desktop crowd.
Broken in many, _many_ respects... Deprecate that crap, remove it
completely in a couple of revisions, let these clowns cope. Yeah,
yeah, I know... Not going to happen ;-/ One can dream, though...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists