linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/43] blackfin: Use set_current_blocked() and block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMjpGUcwkLkHo33WY1vJr4pWPz9wgVcwti5nuqLM2FQYWn6O=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:00:59 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/43] blackfin: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:46, Matt Fleming wrote:
> --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/signal.c
> -       if (ret == 0) {
> -               spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> -               sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked,
> -                         &ka->sa.sa_mask);
> -               if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
> -                       sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
> -               recalc_sigpending();
> -               spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> -       }
> +       if (ret == 0)
> +               block_sigmask(ka, sig);

the Blackfin version holds siglock and calls recalc_sigpending() while
block_sigmask() does neither.  i'm guessing that is expected behavior
now ?
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/