linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] BTRFS: Free inode mutex on lseek error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110820134301.GA8266@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:43:01 -0400
From:	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	chris.mason@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BTRFS: Free inode mutex on lseek error

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:53:17PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:08:25AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On 08/19/2011 08:07 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Introduced with b26751575a9aa55fd6dbf3febde3ff06dfadc44f
> > > 
> > 
> > This has already been fixed by
> > 
> > 9a4327ca1f45f82edad7dc0a4e52ce9316e0950c
> 
> It's not. That patch returns the wrong return value.
>

Oh duh I see, sorry,

Josef 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/