linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Resurrect Intel740 driver: i740fb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m24o1ae7lk.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:13:27 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Cc:	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Resurrect Intel740 driver: i740fb

Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org> writes:
>
> The i740_calc_fifo() function formatting is nice but does not pass
> checkpatch. Making it checkpatch-compliant makes the code look ugly. How to
> make it both nice and compatible with Linux coding style?

When checkpatch.pl and sanity conflict, sanity should generally win.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/