[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6tEOnUzFjKMqNfp10b8SyuJDDFzg0eiPzhKNNCY55LECw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 00:09:53 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] GPIO exodus and cleanup
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 02:16:04PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> The following patch set is rebased on top of Russell's
>>>> 13 cleanup patches and can be finalized as soon as there
>>>> is a branch in RMKs tree that can accumulate this work.
>>>
>>> If Grant acks the relevant ones, they can go to the patch system and
>>> merged into that branch.
>>
>> Thanks that'd be smooth.
>>
>> Grant can you N/ACK the patches you consider relevant for
>> the GPIO subsystem?
>
> Ping on this, on monday I'll pretend it's no big deal and pour them
> into Russells patch tracker anyway, since he's managing more than
> half of the kernels GPIO code in arch/arm/* anyway.
If Russell is okay with it, then go ahead and merge it. I'm being
pretty liberal about GPIO driver moves. I'm fine with them getting
cleaned up after the drivers/gpio move.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists