linux-kernel - Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected 3.1.0-rc2-00190-g3210d19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110822131621.GS2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:16:21 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Cc:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
 3.1.0-rc2-00190-g3210d19

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:09:14AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:

> We've had a report of this on 3.0.1 as well.  Slightly different
> scenario and fs, but the locks in question are the same.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730998
> 
> It seems that with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING on, might_fault will always
> attempt to grab mm->mmap_sem.  The common flow here is that getdents
> calls filldir, which calls copy_to_user, which is what is calling
> might_fault.
> 
> Beyond that, I'm a bit over my head at the moment because I don't know
> if the VFS is right and we just need some more lockdep annotations or
> if there really is a problem.

Don't grab ->i_mutex in ->evict_inode().  Why are you doing that, anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/