[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110822140745.GC27902@router-fw-old.local.net-space.pl>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:07:45 +0200
From: Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Daniel Kiper <dkiper@...-space.pl>, olaf@...fle.de,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, ian.campbell@...rix.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
horms@...ge.net.au, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kexec/arch/i386: Add get_memory_ranges_xen() function
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:01:24AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
[...]
> > +#ifdef HAVE_LIBXENCTRL
> > +static unsigned e820_to_kexec_type(uint32_t type)
> > +{
> > + switch (type) {
> > + case E820_RAM:
> > + return RANGE_RAM;
> > + case E820_ACPI:
> > + return RANGE_ACPI;
> > + case E820_NVS:
> > + return RANGE_ACPI_NVS;
> > + case E820_RESERVED:
>
> For E820_UNUSABLE you want to do that too?
>
> > + default:
> > + return RANGE_RESERVED;
>
> Or should E820_UNUSABLE returne its own type of RANGE?
Kexec does not differentiate between E820_RESERVED and E820_UNUSABLE
(please look into kexec/firmware_memmap.c, parse_memmap_entry()).
It treats both as RANGE_RESERVED. RANGE_UNUSABLE is not defined.
In this situation I stated that it is not worth to change that
and I have mapped all undefined types to RANGE_RESERVED. It means
that E820_UNUSABLE is mapped to RANGE_RESERVED.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists