[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXnDq2Y0wXZgC2yB4KZR_pBYj7Uz4K9ZpeP=5YFpMLfhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:35:15 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is arch/x86_64 kernel relocatable by default from redhat
enterprise 5 originated kernel?
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
>
> so it looks the 64bit kernel is not relocatable according to above
> error, then I went to the distro's kernel source directory and
> couldn't find "RELOCATABLE" config in arch/x86_64/Kconfig, there is
> "RELOCATABLE" config in arch/i386/Kconfig. so I am bit
> confused if arch/x86_64 kernel is relocatable by default or
> relocatable is not supported yet for the redhat 5 originated x86_64
> kernel.
I think x86_64 is relocatable by default, as on RHEL5 x86_64 we
only have one vmlinuz for both production kernel and kdump kernel.
I don't know the history, probably x86_64 supports relocatable from
the beginning, thus there is no such Kconfig on RHEL5.
>
> I also suspect that kexec-tools-1.102pre-126.el5.i386.rpm might be the
> culprit here since it is for i386, but I couldn't install
> kexec-tools-1.102pre-126.el5.x86_64.rpm lack of 64 bit libc.so.6 on
> the custom distro
>
So, probably this is the cause of the problem.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists