[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110822020737.GP2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:07:38 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SYSCALL, ptrace and syscall restart breakages (Re: [RFC] weird
crap with vdso on uml/i386)
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:01:40PM -0400, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> 3. We're worried that pt_regs-using compat syscalls might want the
> regs to appear to match the actual arguments (why?)
run strace and you'll see why.
> 4. ptrace expects the "registers" when SYSCALL happens to match the
> int 0x80 convention. (This is, IMO, sick.)
That's what ptrace is *for*. It's there to let debuggers play with
the program being debugged, including taking a look at the syscall
arguments and modifying them. In a predictable way, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists