[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430802DD7B8C@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:29:23 -0700
From: Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
To: "wharms@....de" <wharms@....de>
CC: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
Pierre Louis Aublin <pierre-louis.aublin@...ia.fr>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c: test the
just-initialized value
> Am 22.08.2011 21:02, schrieb Bing Zhao:
> > Hi Julia,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Julia Lawall [mailto:julia@...u.dk]
> >> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 7:16 AM
> >> To: Pierre Louis Aublin
> >> Cc: Bing Zhao; kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org; John W. Linville; linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org;
> >> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c: test the just-initialized value
> >>
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >>
> >> Test the just-initialized value rather than some other one.
> >>
> >> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> >> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >>
> >> // <smpl>
> >> @r@
> >> identifier x,y,f!={PTR_ERR,ERR_PTR,ERR_CAST};
> >> statement S;
> >> @@
> >>
> >> x = f(...);
> >> (
> >> if (\(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\)) S
> >> |
> >> *if (\(y == NULL\|IS_ERR(y)\))
> >> { ... when != x
> >> return ...; }
> >> )
> >> // </smpl>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bing
> >
> >>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
> >> index b28241c..37ca2f9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/scan.c
> >> @@ -1480,8 +1480,8 @@ mwifiex_update_curr_bss_params(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> }
> >> beacon_ie = kzalloc(ie_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> - if (!bss_desc) {
> >> - dev_err(priv->adapter->dev, " failed to alloc bss_desc\n");
> >> + if (!beacon_ie) {
> >> + dev_err(priv->adapter->dev, " failed to alloc beacon_ie\n");
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> }
> >> memcpy(beacon_ie, ie_buf, ie_len);
> > --
>
>
> this looks like a case for kmemdup()
Hi Walter,
You are right. I believe there are some more cases where kmemdup can be used.
Hi John,
Please apply Julia's patch as I will send a separate patch later to address Walter's comment. Thanks.
>
> just my 2 cents,
Thanks a lot for your 2 cents.
Bing
>
> re,
> wh
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists