lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:51:51 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] drivers_base: platform: use always ->name for
 uevent

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:41:54PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:17:41AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > Grant Likely wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > >>> @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static int platform_uevent(struct device *dev, struct
> > >>> kobj_uevent_env *env)
> > >>>               return rc;
> > >>>
> > >>>       add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=%s%s", PLATFORM_MODULE_PREFIX,
> > >>> -               (pdev->id_entry) ? pdev->id_entry->name : pdev->name);
> > >>> +                       pdev->name);
> > >>
> > >> Yes, this looks like the right thing to do to me.  Also, I think the
> > >> original code is suspect because it causes the uevent data to be
> > >> different after binding a driver to a device.
> > >
> > > Why different? The code matches (pdev->name == id->name) or
> > > (pdev->name ==  driver->name) so in both cases it should be equal to
> > > pdev->name.
> > >
> > > Are you or Greg taking this?
> > 
> > This one is all Greg.
> 
> Greg, do you want to take this patch through your driver core tree, or
> would you prefer to have it come through the xHCI tree?

I'll take it in my driver-core tree separate, as the others don't depend
on this one, right?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ