| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4E52EAB3.4090201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:48:03 +1000 From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com> To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com> CC: "axel.lin@...il.com" <axel.lin@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: ep93xx-fb: add missing include of linux/module.h On 23/08/11 02:40, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Sunday, August 21, 2011 5:31 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote: >> On 22/08/11 10:06, Axel Lin wrote: >>> 2011/8/22 Ryan Mallon<rmallon@...il.com>: >>>> On 22/08/11 09:41, Ryan Mallon wrote: >>>>> On 22/08/11 00:39, Axel Lin wrote: >>>>>> ep93xx-fb.c uses interfaces from linux/module.h, >>>>>> so it should include that file. This patch fixes below build errors. >>>>> What actually changed to make these files broken? Did some other header >>>>> previously include module.h for us? How many other drivers are broken? >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, the change is okay. >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Ryan Mallon<rmallon@...il.com> >>>> Actually, having a second look at this it does not look right. >>>> >>>> drivers/video/ep93xx-fb.c includes linux/platform.h (as its first include), >>>> which includes linux/driver.h, which includes linux/module.h. >>>> >>>> Just tested on Linus' latest tree and both this driver and the ep93xx >>>> backlight driver build fine. What kernel version are you using? >>>> >>>> ~Ryan >>> hi Ryan, >>> >>> The patch is against linux-next tree. >>> I got build error for ep93xx-fb.c and ep93xx_bl.c on linux-next tree. >>> ( next-20110819 ) >> Ok, I see now. The change which caused the breakage is fdb697c: >> "include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever >> possible". How many other drivers got broken now that device.h does not >> include module.h? > Probably a lot... Which is one of the reasons linux-next exists.. . ;-) Does anybody know how we can quickly determine which drivers are broken short of doing an allyesconfig? I tried to do some quick tricks by passing files which contain THIS_MODULE/MODULE_* through cpp, but I get loads of errors in headers files because I'm missing some config includes. Is there an easy way to get the kbuild arguments for the current .config so I can pass them to cpp? > Actually, Paul Gortmaker caused this breakage with the commit. He should > take a deeper look and see what it broke. From his commit: > > Most of the implicit dependencies on module.h being present by > these headers pulling it in have been now weeded out, so we can > finally make this change with hopefully minimal breakage. Quick glance: ryanm@...i:linux-2.6$ grep -lR "^MODULE_" drivers/ | xargs grep -L "linux/module.h\|linux/moduleloader.h\|linux/miscdevice.h\|linux/regmap.h\|linux/irq.h" | wc -l 579 ryanm@...i:linux-2.6$ grep -lR "THIS_MODULE" drivers/ | xargs grep -L "linux/module.h\|linux/moduleloader.h\|linux/miscdevice.h\|linux/regmap.h\|linux/irq.h\|linux/export.h\|acpi/platform/aclinux.h\|xen/xenbus.h" | wc -l 399 Not sure how many of those are really broken though since there may be a few other ways to include module.h/export.h. I would also think there would be a lot more build failure reports if all of those were broken :-). ~Ryan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists