[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E534F33.5070609@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:56:51 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmscan: use atomic-long for shrinker batching
Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> delta = (4 * nr_pages_scanned) / shrinker->seeks;
> @@ -329,12 +327,11 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink,
> * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the
> * scan, there is no need to do an update.
> */
> - do {
> - nr = shrinker->nr;
> - new_nr = total_scan + nr;
> - if (total_scan<= 0)
> - break;
> - } while (cmpxchg(&shrinker->nr, nr, new_nr) != nr);
> + if (total_scan> 0)
> + new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(total_scan,
> + &shrinker->nr_in_batch);
> + else
> + new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_in_batch);
>
> trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrink_ret, nr, new_nr);
BTW, new_nr required only for tracing, maybe this will be better/faster,
because atomic accuracy there isn't required at all.
if (total_scan > 0)
atomic_long_add(total_scan, &shrinker->nr_in_batch);
new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_in_batch);
trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrink_ret, nr, new_nr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists