[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1108231032510.25811@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:33:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: "Zou, Yi" <yi.zou@...el.com>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
"devel@...n-fcoe.org" <devel@...n-fcoe.org>
Subject: RE: [Open-FCoE] [PATCH 2/4] drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c: add missing
test
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Zou, Yi wrote:
> > From nobody Mon Aug 22 15:57:42 CEST 2011
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > To: Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>
> > Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,devel@...n-
> > fcoe.org,linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c: add missing test
> >
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > The initializations of both fcoe_nport_scsi_transport and
> > fcoe_vport_scsi_transport can fail, so test both of them.
> >
> > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @r@
> > identifier x,y,f!={PTR_ERR,ERR_PTR,ERR_CAST};
> > statement S;
> > @@
> >
> > x = f(...);
> > (
> > if (\(x == NULL\|IS_ERR(x)\)) S
> > |
> > *if (\(y == NULL\|IS_ERR(y)\))
> > { ... when != x
> > return ...; }
> > )
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > index ba710e3..9f2e2f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > @@ -1093,11 +1093,20 @@ static int __init fcoe_if_init(void)
> > /* attach to scsi transport */
> > fcoe_nport_scsi_transport =
> > fc_attach_transport(&fcoe_nport_fc_functions);
> > +
> > + if (!fcoe_nport_scsi_transport) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR
> > + "fcoe_nport: Failed to attach to the FC transport\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > fcoe_vport_scsi_transport =
> > fc_attach_transport(&fcoe_vport_fc_functions);
> >
> > - if (!fcoe_nport_scsi_transport) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "fcoe: Failed to attach to the FC
> > transport\n");
> > + if (!fcoe_vport_scsi_transport) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR
> > + "fcoe_vport: Failed to attach to the FC transport\n");
> > + fc_release_transport(fcoe_nport_scsi_transport);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
>
> I understand we were using -ENODEV before, but -ENOMEM is preferred here
> as that's the only err from fc_attach_transport.
OK, I'll fix it. Thanks.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists