linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tty: omap-serial: fix boot hang by converting to use a threaded IRQ handler (was Re: [PATCH] irq: always set IRQF_ONESHOT if no primary handler is specified)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, mporter@...com,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	"Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: omap-serial: fix boot hang by converting to use a
 threaded IRQ handler (was Re: [PATCH] irq: always set IRQF_ONESHOT if no
 primary handler is specified)

Linus,

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> but the "there is no difference for others" seems to be total crap,
> exactly because it results in this IRQF mismatch.
> 
> So I think that commit should just be reverted. Thomas?

Yes. I missed that detail when I applied that patch. Reverting it
seems to be the only sensible solution.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/