[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1108231844140.2807@ionos>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:46:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, mporter@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
"Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: omap-serial: fix boot hang by converting to use a
threaded IRQ handler (was Re: [PATCH] irq: always set IRQF_ONESHOT if no
primary handler is specified)
Linus,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> but the "there is no difference for others" seems to be total crap,
> exactly because it results in this IRQF mismatch.
>
> So I think that commit should just be reverted. Thomas?
Yes. I missed that detail when I applied that patch. Reverting it
seems to be the only sensible solution.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists