| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:44:20 +0200 From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com> To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com> CC: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags Il 22/08/2011 23:22, Sunil Mushran ha scritto: > On 08/22/2011 10:56 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: >> Il 22/08/2011 17:57, Sunil Mushran ha scritto: >>> >>> The following test was used to test the early implementations. >>> http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/seek_data/ >>> >> >> Thank you very much!! I found another point. Your test fails with my >> implementation because here >> (http://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=415) says: "If whence is >> SEEK_DATA, the file offset shall be set to the smallest location of a >> byte not within a hole and not less than offset. It shall be an error >> if no such byte exists." So in this case I return ENXIO but the test >> expects another value. I have to say that there is a bit of confusion >> about the real behavior of this new feature :) >> > > That's test 5.10, 5.12, 5.14. And it expects -ENXIO. > > Which test is failing for you? > Sorry, I was reading the results in a wrong way. Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists