[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878vqk4wel.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:22:18 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, jbaron@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vapier@...too.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC] UML/x86_64 module loader
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:38:43 +0200, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> UserModeLinux is using the arch specific module functions from
> arch/x86/kernel/module.c.
> On i386 this works perfectly fine but on x86_64 it causes problems.
>
> apply_relocate_add() assumes modules compiled with -mcmodel=kernel
> because the kernel lives in the negative 2GiB of the address space.
> This assumption is not true for UML.
> On an UML instance with more than 512MiB of memory no modules can be
> loaded because vmalloc() locates the module near the 2GiB limit and the
> ELF relocations causes an overflow. (Detected by "if ((s64)val != *(s32
> *)loc)" in apply_relocate_add()).
>
> Now I'm not sure how to fix this.
> Mostly because I'm not a module loader nor an ELF expert. 8-)
I think you need to write your own routines. It shouldn't be that hard,
just keep implementing relocations until you're done :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists