[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110823080451.7acdaa71@mschwide>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:04:51 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/43] [S390]: Use block_sigmask()
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:46:42 +0100
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
>
> Use the new helper function block_sigmask() which centralises the code
> for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal
> and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures.
>
> In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this
> helper function should stop that from happening again.
>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> ---
>
> This patch depends on "[PATCH 01/43] signal: Add block_sigmask() for
> adding sigmask to current->blocked" so they need to go through the
> same tree but this patch would benefit from some maintainer ACK's.
>
> arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c | 6 +-----
> arch/s390/kernel/signal.c | 6 +-----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Identical code replacement and compiles fine.
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists