[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314170783.5245.24.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:26:23 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, tj@...nel.org,
Metathronius Galabant <m.galabant@...glemail.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Adrian Drzewiecki <z@...e.net>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [slub p4 6/7] slub: per cpu cache for partial pages
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> Allow filling out the rest of the kmem_cache_cpu cacheline with pointers to
> partial pages. The partial page list is used in slab_free() to avoid
> per node lock taking.
>
> In __slab_alloc() we can then take multiple partial pages off the per
> node partial list in one go reducing node lock pressure.
>
> We can also use the per cpu partial list in slab_alloc() to avoid scanning
> partial lists for pages with free objects.
>
> The main effect of a per cpu partial list is that the per node list_lock
> is taken for batches of partial pages instead of individual ones.
>
> Potential future enhancements:
>
> 1. The pickup from the partial list could be perhaps be done without disabling
> interrupts with some work. The free path already puts the page into the
> per cpu partial list without disabling interrupts.
Nice patches!
Could you share possible ways for this potential enhancement?
Thanks,
Lin Ming
>
> 2. __slab_free() may have some code paths that could use optimization.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists