lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:10:56 +0200
From:	"Michal Nazarewicz" <mnazarewicz@...gle.com>
To:	"Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	"Felipe Balbi" <balbi@...com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	"Yang Rui Rui" <ruirui.r.yang@...to.com>,
	"Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] usb: gadget: replace "is_dualspeed" with
 "max_speed"

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:49:37 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>  
wrote:
> Still, maybe I was wrong.  Maybe it would be better to use the fastest
> speed supported by at least one of the function drivers.  The user can
> always force a SuperSpeed-capable device to run at high speed by using
> a USB-2 cable to plug it in.  I'm not sure whether the user could force
> such a device to run at full speed, however.

I'm actually wondering whether we really need to worry about it.
composite_driver has the “max_speed” field and I would just leave it as
composite driver's author responsibility to put correct value there.

One thing that could be worth doing is iterate over all the configurations
and figure out if at least one supports the speed declared by “max_speed”
and if not, lower it.

Like I've said before, as additional functionality, composite.c could
check if it's USB_SPEED_UNKWONW in which case it would look for the lowest
speed that all the functions support.

Such configuration would allow composite driver authors set the speed to
USB_SPEED_SUPER when they mean “choose maximum speed at least one function
supports” and to “USB_SPEED_UNKWONW” when they mean “choose maximum speed
all the functions support”.

Does that make sense?

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@...gle.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ