linux-kernel - Re: Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E552B01.7090109@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:46:57 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Steevven1 <steevven1@...il.com>
CC:	Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x

On 8/24/2011 9:44 AM, Steevven1 wrote:

> VERY interesting! The second link seems to imply that Phoronix has
> independently found this same bug that we've been talking about in my
> originally-linked ubuntuforums discussion. Specifically, the
> interesting quote is:
>
> "Besides the new Linux 3.1 kernel power regression, there's also a
> power regression introduced in the Linux 3.0 kernel that has
> previously not been talked about on Phoronix. The Linux 3.0 power draw
> is up by 24% over the Linux 2.6.39 kernel."


sounds like good news; a 24% regression is MUCH easier to bisect than a 
0.05% regression ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/