[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108241226550.31357@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Michal Hocko wrote:
> When we are in the global OOM condition then you are right, we have a
> higher chance to panic. I still find the patch an improvement because
> encountering a frozen task and looping over it without any progress
> (even though there are other tasks that could be killed) is more
> probable than having no killable task at all.
> On non-NUMA machines there is even not a big chance that somebody would
> be able to thaw a task as the system is already on knees.
>
That's obviously false since we call oom_killer_disable() in
freeze_processes() to disable the oom killer from ever being called in the
first place, so this is something you need to resolve with Rafael before
you cause more machines to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists