linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] usb: Provide usb_speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABqxG0fyNNV39=tnTOVEK+Ko_UxdD0Mc593T7ARFTE47+ab=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:16:04 +0800
From:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Michal Nazarewicz <mnazarewicz@...gle.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Yang Rui Rui <ruirui.r.yang@...to.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] usb: Provide usb_speed_string() function

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>
>> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>>
>> In a few places in the kernel, the code prints
>> a human-readable USB device speed (eg. "high speed").
>> This involves a switch statement sometimes wrapped
>> around in ({ ... }) block leading to code repetition.
>>
>> To mitigate this issue, this commit introduces
>> usb_speed_string() function, which returns
>> a human-readable name of provided speed.
>>
>> It also changes a few places switch was used to use
>> this new function.  This changes a bit the way the
>> speed is printed in few instances at the same time
>> standardising it.
>
>> --- a/drivers/usb/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/Makefile
>> @@ -51,3 +51,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC) += musb/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_USB_RENESAS_USBHS)      += renesas_usbhs/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_USB_OTG_UTILS)  += otg/
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_USB_GADGET)     += gadget/
>> +
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_USB)            += common.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_USB_GADGET)     += common.o
>
> Will this cause problems?  For example, what if CONFIG_USB is Y and
> CONFIG_USB_GADGET is M?
>
> Also, it seems a little silly to have an entire kernel module devoted
> to a single, little function.  This is a symptom of the difficulty of
> sharing code between the host-side and gadget-side USB stacks.
>

How about put the code as inline function in ch9.h?

> Alan Stern
>
>



-- 
Regards
Yang RuiRui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/