[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5571A6.6050705@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:48:22 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: patch "TTY: remove tty_locked" added to tty tree
On 08/24/2011 11:42 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> So, is your original patch you sent in this thread still needed?
If you mean "TTY: remove tty_locked", then yes, it's fine to see
tty_locked go. It looks like we won't need it to fix the stalls in the
end. If you mean TTY-fix-stalls-on-BTM-when-waiting-until-sent, that one
will be superseded by a new one.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists