[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E555AD0.3020101@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:10:56 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] x86: Ticket lock + cmpxchg cleanup
On 08/24/2011 11:24 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> The patches look good to me, and 50 lines less is always nice too!
>>
>> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> So I mostly agree, except for the abortion that is the
> __ticket_spin_unlock changes. Please just kill that part.
Could we just kill SMP support for OOSTORE machines now? That would be
the cleanest possible fix...
> So I'd much have preferred that the xadd helper go in first (07/18),
> then the patch to make __ticket_spin_lock the same for 32/64 would go
> in next (04/18) using that helper, and then they'd just have been
> identical automatically.
>
> Instead, there are a few patches that actually make the code uglier
> temporarily, only to then be undone later. That seems bogus, when it
> looks so simple to fix it.
Yep, OK. The current series is a history of incremental development; I
can easily clean it up into something that appeared perfectly formed.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists