[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5583B3.8080309@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:05:23 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] x86: Ticket lock + cmpxchg cleanup
On 08/24/2011 03:59 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 03:53 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>>> Could we just kill SMP support for OOSTORE machines now? That would be
>>> the cleanest possible fix...
>> No it wouldn't. The asm version would *still* be cleaner than the "C
>> plus random barriers".
>>
>> It's not like the C version is "portable" in any case.
>
> If there's no need to have a locked instruction, then it could simply be:
>
> barrier();
> lock->head++;
> barrier();
>
> with no need for asm at all.
>
That's not guaranteed in any way to generate a locally atomic instruction.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists