[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110824233422.GD26417@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:34:24 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:12:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Indeed, this was a bogus patch. The version I posted on the -rcu git
> tree a few days ago has the correct "rdp->qs_pending = 0". I thought
> that I had chased down all the bogus copies, but obviously not. :-(
Ah ok.
> > Should it perhaps set it to 1 only if we have rnp->gpnum > rnp->completed ?
>
> I would rather keep it simple. If rnp->gpnum > rnp->completed, then
> the newly onlined CPU will notice and adjust appropriately soon enough.
Ah, just to ensure I understood well is that because rcu_pending() (called
from tick) would detect rnp->gpnum != rdp->gpnum and thus trigger the softirq
that notes the new gpnum and toggles qs_pending?
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > > rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rnp->completed - 1;
> > > }
> > > raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists