linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110824053317.GC26391@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:33:18 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> 
> Since sci_port_enable() and sci_port_disable() may be run with
> interrupts off and they execute pm_runtime_get_sync() and
> pm_runtime_put_sync(), respectively, the SCI device's
> power.irq_safe flags has to be used to indicate that it is safe
> to execute runtime PM callbacks for this device with interrupts off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>

Not sure how you want this one handled. Did you simply want to roll this
in with your other patch with my Acked-by, or should I be taking this
through my tree already regardless of the 1/2 patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/