[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110825013346.GD26391@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:33:51 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 24, 2011, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > >
> > > Since sci_port_enable() and sci_port_disable() may be run with
> > > interrupts off and they execute pm_runtime_get_sync() and
> > > pm_runtime_put_sync(), respectively, the SCI device's
> > > power.irq_safe flags has to be used to indicate that it is safe
> > > to execute runtime PM callbacks for this device with interrupts off.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >
> > Not sure how you want this one handled. Did you simply want to roll this
> > in with your other patch with my Acked-by, or should I be taking this
> > through my tree already regardless of the 1/2 patch?
>
> I'd prefer to push it through my tree, if you don't mind. Magnus has
> already acked it for me, hopefully that's OK?
>
Sure, sounds fine to me. I'll just ignore it then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists