[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5656E6.1090204@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:06:30 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected
On 08/25/2011 04:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:42:10AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 08/25/2011 05:04 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >>
> > >> It could increase the flood count independently of the accessed bit of
> > >> the spte being updated, zapping after 3 attempts as it is now.
> > >>
> > >> But additionally reset the flood count if the gpte appears to be valid
> > >> (points to an existant gfn if the present bit is set, or if its zeroed).
> > >
> > >Well not zero, as thats a common pattern for non ptes.
> > >
> >
> > On 32-bit with 4GB RAM, practically anything is a valid gpte.
>
> The following could be required to consider a valid gpte, for write
> flood detection purposes:
>
> - Must be present.
> - PageCacheDisable must be unset.
> - PageWriteThrough must be unset.
>
Unless the guest is using PAT.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists