[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_QrgHHdiev-Vxt=FrwkJg-3qfjxzqkPmgLbwZ=U4358Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:44:31 +0900
From: NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
Subject: RFC : mmc : Use wait_for_completion_timeout() instead of
wait_for_completion in case of multiple write blocks.
Hi.
If card is infinitely holding pull down busy line(data 0) while
writing multiple blocks, write will be blocked in
mmc_wait_for_req_done().
I suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout instread of
wait_for_completion like the below code.
How do you think about my suggestion ?
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host, struct
mmc_request *mrq)
{
unsigned int write_timeout = 0;
if(mrq->data != NULL && (mrq->data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE) &&
(mrq->cmd->opcode & MMC_WRITE_MULTIPLE_BLOCK)) {
write_timeout =
usecs_to_jiffies(mrq->data->timeout_ns/1000) * mrq->data->blocks;
wait_for_completion_timeout(&mrq->completion, write_timeout);
}
else wait_for_completion(&mrq->completion);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists