| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1314349633-13155-2-git-send-email-dczhu@mips.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:07:12 +0800
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
To: <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
CC: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>, <eyal@...s.com>, <zenon@...s.com>,
<dczhu@...s.com>, <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Pass available resources into pci_create_bus()
Currently, after pci_create_bus(), resources available on the bus could be
handled by pci_scan_child_bus(). The problem is that, in
pci_scan_child_bus(), before calling arch-dependent pcibios_fixup_bus(),
PCI quirks will probably conflict (while doing pci_claim_resource()) with
resources like system controller's I/O resource that have not yet been
added to the bus. One can see that, by default, ioport_resource and
iomem_resource are filled into the bus->resource[] array as the initial
resources in pci_create_bus(). So, to avoid such conflicts, add those
really available resources right before returning the newly created bus in
pci_create_bus() whose interface should then be extended to receive them.
A related discussion thread can be found here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/mips/msg41654.html
Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dczhu@...s.com>
---
Changes (v3 - v2):
None
Changes (v2 - v1):
o Add more info to the patch description.
o Fix arch breaks in default resource setup discovered by Bjorn Helgaas.
arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c | 3 ++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 3 ++-
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/probe.c | 15 +++++++++++----
include/linux/pci.h | 3 ++-
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
index 4cfae20..9c35aa6 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
@@ -1581,7 +1581,8 @@ static void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
node ? node->full_name : "<NO NAME>");
/* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
- bus = pci_create_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno, hose->ops, hose);
+ bus = pci_create_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
+ hose->ops, hose, NULL);
if (bus == NULL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
hose->global_number);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
index 32656f1..2ede26a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
@@ -1703,7 +1703,8 @@ void __devinit pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
node ? node->full_name : "<NO NAME>");
/* Create an empty bus for the toplevel */
- bus = pci_create_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno, hose->ops, hose);
+ bus = pci_create_bus(hose->parent, hose->first_busno,
+ hose->ops, hose, NULL);
if (bus == NULL) {
pr_err("Failed to create bus for PCI domain %04x\n",
hose->global_number);
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 1e94f94..77c38bb 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
- bus = pci_create_bus(parent, pbm->pci_first_busno, pbm->pci_ops, pbm);
+ bus = pci_create_bus(parent, pbm->pci_first_busno,
+ pbm->pci_ops, pbm, NULL);
if (!bus) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
node->full_name);
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index c953302..bab2113 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
memcpy(bus->sysdata, sd, sizeof(*sd));
kfree(sd);
} else {
- bus = pci_create_bus(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops, sd);
+ bus = pci_create_bus(NULL, busnum, &pci_root_ops, sd, NULL);
if (bus) {
get_current_resources(device, busnum, domain, bus);
bus->subordinate = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 8473727..47a364c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1516,7 +1516,8 @@ unsigned int __devinit pci_scan_child_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
}
struct pci_bus * pci_create_bus(struct device *parent,
- int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata)
+ int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
+ struct pci_bus_resource *bus_res)
{
int error;
struct pci_bus *b, *b2;
@@ -1570,8 +1571,14 @@ struct pci_bus * pci_create_bus(struct device *parent,
pci_create_legacy_files(b);
b->number = b->secondary = bus;
- b->resource[0] = &ioport_resource;
- b->resource[1] = &iomem_resource;
+
+ /* Add initial resources to the bus */
+ if (bus_res != NULL)
+ list_add_tail(&b->resources, &bus_res->list);
+ else {
+ b->resource[0] = &ioport_resource;
+ b->resource[1] = &iomem_resource;
+ }
return b;
@@ -1592,7 +1599,7 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_bus_parented(struct device *parent,
{
struct pci_bus *b;
- b = pci_create_bus(parent, bus, ops, sysdata);
+ b = pci_create_bus(parent, bus, ops, sysdata, NULL);
if (b)
b->subordinate = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
return b;
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 8c230cb..5e1bacd 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -666,7 +666,8 @@ static inline struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *o
return root_bus;
}
struct pci_bus *pci_create_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
- struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
+ struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
+ struct pci_bus_resource *bus_res);
struct pci_bus *pci_add_new_bus(struct pci_bus *parent, struct pci_dev *dev,
int busnr);
void pcie_update_link_speed(struct pci_bus *bus, u16 link_status);
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists