linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: brcmfmac: Consolidate debugging macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E576637.4020209@broadcom.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:24:07 +0200
From:	"Arend van Spriel" <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
cc:	"Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>,
	"Henry Ptasinski" <henryp@...adcom.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Brett Rudley" <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@...adcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>, "Kan Yan" <kanyan@...adcom.com>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: brcmfmac: Consolidate debugging macros

On 08/26/2011 11:19 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 26 sierpnia 2011 11:02 użytkownik Joe Perches<joe@...ches.com>  napisał:
>> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 10:55 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> 2011/8/25 Joe Perches<joe@...ches.com>:
>>>> Convert multiple BRCMF_<debug_level>  macros to a single
>>>> brcmf_dbg(level, fmt, ...) macro.
>>> I'm not sure if that "_dbg" suffix is a really good choice. You use
>>> "_dbg" for all the kinds of messages, while "DEBUG" is already one
>>> kind of messages.
>> No, not really.  These _are_ debugging uses.
>>
>> The #include is called dhd_dbg.h and
>> the whole block is guarded by
>>
>> #if defined(BCMDBG)
>>
>>> We have also other types like EMERG, ALERT, CRIT,
>>> ERR, WARNING, NOTICE, INFO and DEBUG.
>> Except for the last, those aren't debugging uses,
>> these are.
> It makes sense, maybe some messages should be just always printed. It
> seems some of they may be important for common-user having problem
> with his card. Just few random ones:
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "device attach failed\n");
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "Failed to enable F1 Err: 0x%08x\n", err_ret);
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "MACEVENT: %s [unsupported version -->  brcmf
> version:%d dongle version:%d]\n",
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "mismatched OUI, bailing\n");
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "brcmf_net_attach failed, err %d\n",
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "failed to bring up cfg80211\n");
> brcmf_dbg(ERROR, "HT Avail request error: %d\n", err);

Hi Rafał,

The feedback from Greg was that no user would be interested in it so we 
cleaned it up and put it under Kconfig option.

Gr. AvS

-- 
Almost nobody dances sober, unless they happen to be insane.
-- H.P. Lovecraft --


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/