[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E576E6F.1030909@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:59:11 +0400
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: skip frozen tasks
David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
>>> A much better solution would be to lower the badness score that the oom
>>> killer uses for PF_FROZEN threads so that they aren't considered a
>>> priority for kill unless there's nothing else left to kill.
>>
>> Anyway, oom killer shouldn't loop endlessly if it see TIF_MEMDIE on frozen
>> task,
>> it must go on and try to kill somebody else. We cannot wait for thawing this
>> task.
>>
>
> Did you read my suggestion? I quoted it above again for you. The badness
> heuristic would only select those tasks to kill as a last resort in the
> hopes they will eventually be thawed and may exit. Panicking the entire
> machine for what could be isolated by a cgroup is insanity.
Maybe just fix this "panic" logic? OOM killer should panic only on global memory shortage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists