linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf_event: semantic of PERF_SAMPLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBSaW3ShYbJoO6YdFpZ7Rt+OfszP8m-uLSoBjCWZYVQ0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:02:02 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_event: semantic of PERF_SAMPLE_READ unclear

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 19:19 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> But the difficulty is that
>> we cannot grab any locks, not sure we need one given the call path.
>
> Nah we should be able to simply iterate all siblings and update them
> in-place, since its group members they should all be co-scheduled. The
> only difficulty is cross pmu group members..
>
Are we allowing event from different PMU to be in the same event group?
If so, is that useful?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/