[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110826141032.GA13620@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:10:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
roland@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0
On 08/26, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> On 08/25/2011 04:57 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/24, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>
> >> The long and the short of it is, making RLIMIT_CORE == 0 for the ispipe case
> >> skip the core dump, breaks lots of user space expectations
> >
> > Not sure this really makes sense, but perhaps ispipe can skip the dump
> > if RLIMIT_CORE == 0 _and_ the signal was sent from the user-space.
>
> I like the sound of that, though don't know the details for
> determining signal origin. SIGQUIT generated from a Ctrl-\
> from the tty driver might be problematic for example.
Hmm. Thanks for correcting me.
Indeed, contrary to what I expected tty uses SEND_SIG_PRIV, not
SEND_SIG_NOINFO. This is SI_KERNEL. Hmm. OTOH, this makes sense
from check_kill_permission() pov.
Thanks.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists