[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110826153843.GE3298@somewhere>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:38:44 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, bblum@...rew.cmu.edu,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, oleg@...hat.com, paul@...lmenage.org,
tj@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cgroups: Don't attach task to subsystem if migration
failed
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:44:36PM -0700, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch titled
> cgroups: fix ordering of calls in cgroup_attach_proc
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> cgroups-fix-ordering-of-calls-in-cgroup_attach_proc.patch
>
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
> a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
> b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
> c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
> reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
>
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>
> See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
>
> The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: cgroups: fix ordering of calls in cgroup_attach_proc
> From: Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>
>
> awaiting useful changelog...
>
Here is the patch with a (trial of a) useful changelog. Subject
has been changed as well:
---
>From a9b84e395a0355cd1aa5ee0f525cd682b16dad63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:44:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cgroups: Don't attach task to subsystem if migration failed
If a task has exited to the point it has called cgroup_exit()
already, then we can't migrate it to another cgroup anymore.
This can happen when we are attaching a task to a new cgroup
between the call to ->can_attach_task() on subsystems and
the migration that is eventually tried in cgroup_task_migrate().
In this case cgroup_task_migrate() returns -ESRCH and we don't
want to attach the task to the subsystems because the attachment
to the new cgroup itself failed.
Fix this by only calling ->attach_task() on the subsystems if
the cgroup migration succeeded.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
kernel/cgroup.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 1d2b6ce..84bdace 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2135,14 +2135,17 @@ int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
oldcgrp = task_cgroup_from_root(tsk, root);
if (cgrp == oldcgrp)
continue;
- /* attach each task to each subsystem */
- for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
- if (ss->attach_task)
- ss->attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
- }
/* if the thread is PF_EXITING, it can just get skipped. */
retval = cgroup_task_migrate(cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk, true);
- BUG_ON(retval != 0 && retval != -ESRCH);
+ if (retval == 0) {
+ /* attach each task to each subsystem */
+ for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
+ if (ss->attach_task)
+ ss->attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
+ }
+ } else {
+ BUG_ON(retval != -ESRCH);
+ }
}
/* nothing is sensitive to fork() after this point. */
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists