linux-kernel - VM: add would_have

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:14:22 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: VM: add would_have_oomkilled sysctl

At various times in the past, we've had reports where users have been
convinced that the oomkiller was too heavy handed. I added this sysctl
mostly as a knob for them to see that the kernel really doesn't do much better
without killing something.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
index 5e3aa83..79a27b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/oom.h
+++ b/include/linux/oom.h
@@ -72,5 +72,6 @@ extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
 extern int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks;
 extern int sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task;
 extern int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
+extern int sysctl_would_have_oomkilled;
 #endif /* __KERNEL__*/
 #endif /* _INCLUDE_LINUX_OOM_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 5abfa15..a0fed6d 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -1000,6 +1000,13 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
 		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
 	},
 	{
+		.procname	= "would_have_oomkilled",
+		.data		= &sysctl_would_have_oomkilled,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_would_have_oomkilled),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
+	},
+	{
 		.procname	= "overcommit_ratio",
 		.data		= &sysctl_overcommit_ratio,
 		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_overcommit_ratio),
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 7dcca55..281ac39 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
 int sysctl_panic_on_oom;
 int sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task;
 int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks = 1;
+int sysctl_would_have_oomkilled;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zone_scan_lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
@@ -477,6 +478,13 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
 	}
 
 	task_lock(p);
+	if (sysctl_would_have_oomkilled) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: would have killed process %d (%s), but continuing instead...\n",
+			__func__, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
+		task_unlock(p);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %d or sacrifice child\n",
 		message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
 	task_unlock(p);
-- 
1.7.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/