linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] gma500: frame buffer locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110826193331.5d42e0bf@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:33:31 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] gma500: frame buffer locking

> > index e861488..af2eec8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void __call_console_drivers(unsigned start, unsigned end)
> >  	struct console *con;
> >  
> >  	for_each_console(con) {
> > -		if (exclusive_console && con != exclusive_console)
> > +		if (0 && exclusive_console && con != exclusive_console)
> >  			continue;
> >  		if ((con->flags & CON_ENABLED) && con->write &&
> >  				(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) ||
> 
> Are you sure you want this in the tree?  I don't feel comfortable making
> this fix just for one staging driver right now, do you?

Oops no thats a debugging hack while using netconsole to chase out the
bug.. that bit shouldn't be there !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/