lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:17:56 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	acme@...hat.com, ming.m.lin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: collect multiplexing timing information in perf
 record


On 08/26/2011 12:02 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:

>>> +static int
>>> +sample_read2u64(const u64 *array, u64 fmt)
>>> +{
>>> +     u64 nr = 1;
>>> +     int ret = 1; /* nr or value */
>>> +
>>> +     if (fmt & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED)
>>> +             ret++;
>>> +
>>> +     if (fmt & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
>>> +             ret++;
>>> +
>>> +     if (fmt & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP) {
>>> +             nr = *(u64 *)array;
>>> +             ret += nr;
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>> +     if (fmt & PERF_FORMAT_ID)
>>> +             ret += nr;
>>
>> Why not add
>> struct read_format {
>>        u64     value;
>>        u64     time_enabled;
>>        u64     time_running;
>>        u64     id;
>> };
>>
>> to perf_sample and save the data there?
>>
> I am not following you here.
> Are you talking about the kernel API or perf tool internals?
> 
> The only way to have timing saved in each sample is via
> PERF_SAMPLE_READ and a read_format which includes
> time_enabled + time_running.

I meant in that function you added above -- sample_read2u64. You are
moving the array pointer forward and essentially throwing away data that
was pushed to userspace. Why not add a struct and save that data for use
elsewhere in the builtin code? And the order of the data is a function
of whether PERF_FORMAT_GROUP is set (see perf_event.h file).

David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ