[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110826064838.GB3903@sun>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:48:38 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Ralf Jung <ralfjung-e@....de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, ioapic: Reserve only 128 bytes for IOAPICs
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 06:41:57PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 05:17 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > If the OS allocated the next 128 bytes to another device, it sounds
> > like it would cause a conflict on Intel boxes. This must be an area
> > that differs between vendors. I haven't seen a spec that mentions 256
> > bytes as the required minimum MMIO size for IOAPICs, and apparently
> > the AMD IOAPIC decodes 240 bytes or fewer.
> >
>
> For what it's worth, it's probably a bad idea on x86 for the OS to
> allocate addresses in the 0xFExxxxxx range...
>
> -hpa
>
I rather wonder if there a way to assign a different address for the
watchdog Bjorn referring to. I don't have such machine to test but
seems its base address is configurable via pmio. Just curious.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists