[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110827140511.GL3298@somewhere>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:05:13 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] res_counter: Allow charge failure pointer to be null
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:44:22AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > So that callers of res_counter_charge() don't have to create and
> > pass this pointer even if they aren't interested in it.
> >
>
> Why not make this change early, or even do this in "[PATCH 5/8]".
Would be more simple yeah.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists