linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] support ioctl for tunable user request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4E5B65C6.6070300@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:11:18 +0900
From:	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To:	Lin Ming <lxy@...pku.edu.cn>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] support ioctl for tunable user request

Hi

Lin Ming wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote:
>> This patch is added the ioctl for tunable user request.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What's the use case for this new ioctl?
> 
In my case, this ioctl is used the background operation for eMMC.
In eMMC's case, background operation(BKOPS) is supported.
(but that is running with only card notifier, so i added new ioctl for user request)

if we send the BKOPS request, card is notified to need the BKOPS. 
then running background operation. (Then user's responsibility is done)

In future, i think that other block device should be used this ioctl.
(if supported like BKOPS)

Regard,
Jaehoon Chung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/