[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110829124112.GA4828@quad>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:41:12 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, emunson@...bm.net,
vweaver1@...s.utk.edu
Subject: [PATCH] perf_event: fix broken calc_timer_values()
We detected a serious issue with PERF_SAMPLE_READ and
timing information when events were being multiplexing.
Samples would have time_running > time_enabled. That
was easy to reproduce with a libpfm4 example (ran 3
times to cause multiplexing on Core 2):
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
IIP:0x0000000040062d ... PERIOD:2355332948 ENA=40144625315 RUN=60014875184
syst_smpl: WARNING: time_running > time_enabled
63277537998 uops_retired:freq=1 , scaled
The bug was not present in kernel up to 3.0. It turns
out the bug was introduced by the following commit:
commit c4794295917ebeda8013b6cb9c8d71ab4f74a1fa
Author: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:34:38 2011 -0400
events: Move lockless timer calculation into helper function
The parameters of the function got reversed yet the call sites
were not updated to reflect the change. That lead to time_running
and time_enabled being swapped. That had no effect when there was
no multiplexing because in that case time_running = time_enabled
but it would show up in any other scenario.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index adc3ef3..6bacaee 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3354,8 +3354,8 @@ static int perf_event_index(struct perf_event *event)
}
static void calc_timer_values(struct perf_event *event,
- u64 *running,
- u64 *enabled)
+ u64 *enabled,
+ u64 *running)
{
u64 now, ctx_time;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists