[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314633577.2816.107.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:59:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/32] nohz/cpuset: Don't stop the tick if posix cpu
timers are running
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:52 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> If either a per thread or a per process posix cpu timer is running,
> don't stop the tick.
>
> TODO: restart the tick if it is stopped and a posix cpu timer is
> enqueued. Check we probably need a memory barrier for the per
> process posix timer that can be enqueued from another task
> of the group.
it would
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
> #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
> @@ -2491,6 +2492,9 @@ bool cpuset_nohz_can_stop_tick(void)
> if (rcu_pending(cpu))
> return false;
>
> + if (posix_cpu_timers_running(current))
> + return false;
> +
> return true;
> }
Doesn't belong here, go poke at tick_nohz_can_stop_tick().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists